|
e-mail
 |
Murphy Martin Commentary
July 28, 2005
"Television: Then and Now"
Television is the most
powerful social instrument yet devised! In its early days, it even
acted as a unifying force in American society. With only three major
networks, Americans were united by the shows they watched; after all
there were only three options on any given night. But with more and
more local stations, cable networks, the booming internet, movies,
it's no longer the unifying force it once was. It is, nevertheless,
a prominent, if not preeminent, source for information, including
news today.
I have actively participated in, or closely observed, television
news since 1960. In the early days, most people who staffed
television news rooms came from print or radio journalism, with
little or no college training in the world of television journalism.
As television sets made their way into more and more American homes,
the news anchor position became a seat of honor, prestige, and
later, power.
After nearly three years in the anchor job at WFAA-TV in Dallas,
ABC-TV hired me to move into the late night news anchor job in
February 1963. It is the same spot filled so capably today by Ted
Koppel and Nightline . Koppel also began his ABC career in
1963. When I arrived at the network there were only a handful of
network anchors: Huntley-Brinkley at NBC, Walter Cronkite at CBS,
and Ron Cochran at ABC all did news programs at the dinner hour
while I anchored the only late evening network news program then
scheduled.
Looking back one finds many
changes have taken place. Dan Rather moved in at CBS before giving
way to Bob Schieffer. Tom Brokaw replaced stayed in the
Huntley-Brinkley spot for a number of years and Peter Jennings has
held down the ABC anchor job since the early eighties until lung
cancer forced him to take some time off. But the changes that have
taken place have not just been personnel-wise, there have been many
other changes---some good and many not so good.
Since its inception television news has dominated American life,
telling us what to eat, what to drink, what to drive, who and what
we should support and who to vote for. But television news is facing
new problems. According to recent surveys, the number of television
sets in use is dwindling as people find other ways to occupy their
time. An increasing number of cable networks, the Internet, video
games, and a resurgence at theater box offices.
Fewer people are watching the
three basic networks for the news even in a time of rising
population. Yet despite the dilution of their total audience
numbers, the masses still depend on television news of some form or
other for answers to the day's pressing concerns whether it's the
economy, terrorism, health issues, war on the other side of the
world, or whatever. That's no different than the pattern set with
the advent of television. But something IS different.
In the early days, television had earned the trust of the viewing
public. Viewers believed it if they saw it on the news. The most
expensive advertising rates were those within and adjacent to the
news because advertisers knew that was when viewership peaked. But
somewhere, somehow, there began a subtle shift in trust. It's hard
to pin down exactly when this trust of the media began to be
questioned. Maybe the 60's during the Vietnam war and all the
demonstrations in the streets of America, but for sure people began
to question what they heard on television and radio and read in
newspapers. Or maybe it even postdates that time frame, arising out
of Watergate. In any event since then it has been all downhill.
Networks are trying everything to regain lost viewers. Newscasts
today are loaded with entertainment news and magazine pieces and
features and not a lot of news from that particular day. Check your
next local or network half-hour news program and see if you get much
more than seven to nine minutes of hard news stories. Most of the
program will be entertainment news, feature stories that have been
sitting on the shelf waiting for the ratings period time to be used
and heavier sports and weather segments than usual. Whatever is
happening the numbers continue to drop. A USA Today Poll in 2003
showed public confidence in the media at an anemic 36-per cent.
Is television still the most powerful social instrument yet devised?
Yes but it is losing it's huge audience numbers. Next week we will
look beneath the surface and see if we can locate more reasons trust
in media is more questionable than ever.
Murphy Martin
Your thoughts and comments forwarded to my website will be
appreciated.
e-mail
murphy@murphymartin.com
Previous commentaries:
July 21 - "The Mick"
July 14 - "Forty Years and Counting"
|