(home)      (subscribe)     (your comments)

Feedback 
in response to ... 

"AM - FM - XM - Sirius 2003"
An essay of opinion by Larry Shannon
Published August 20, 2003

© 2003 RadioDailyNews.com   All Rights Reserved.  The entire essay or excerpts from the essay may be reprinted, published in whole or part or electronically distributed with proper attribution to the author and RadioDailyNews.com. 

I enjoyed Larry Shannon's article about the future of satellite radio.  Thanks for posting it (on SDRadio.net).

His 'march of technology' theme is dominant in the most recent publication of the SETI Institute called, "SETI 2020."  In it, an argument is made for the eventual disappearance of electromagnetic waves as a means to communicate on a planet, such as we do here on earth.  One of the primary strategies of the SETI search is to detect RF leakage from a civilization's home planet; however, increasingly here on earth we communicate more with cable and with other point-to-point technologies than we do through the air.  Should we expect other
 civilizations to provide us with a limited 'window of discovery' that our history gives them?  I wonder.  This certainly changes one of the elements of the 'Drake Equation' which is a quantification of a variety of factors that contribute to the likelihood of discovering ET.  You can plug and chug your own estimates on the Web site: www.seti.org

 By the way, the little talk show I do -- The SETI Institute's "Are We Alone?" -- has been on Sirius satellite since last year (Talk Stream #146.)  I do it all from home: sell time, produce spots, co-host, etc., all with ISDN, Comrex module, Instant Replay, Symetrix voice processor, Behringer mixer and Sennheiser.  Once a week, I connect with at least two scientists who provide answers to listeners' questions regarding the answer to one of humanity's greatest questions, "Are we alone?"  We have 45 markets now (L.A. SFO, DFW, DC, Boston and other smaller cities) and I'm looking forward to adding more after the first of the year with a
 little incentive program I dreamed up.

 Returning to Larry's article:  I'm reminded of one of Bill Gates' early axioms:  "The future is not in the hardware, but in the software." Apply it to radio and we might want to answer this question:  "What can I provide listeners that no one else can?"   What 'software' do I provide?  Howard Stern, Rush, Jeff 'n' Jer, all provide unique entertainment -- their own unique 'software '--  and they are all appreciated by various audiences.  The folks who better watch out are the ones just playing the songs.  I did it at KBEST 95 for a few years and had a ball; but, things change; so, for me, the privilege of doing this show with the SETI Institute provides a ready answer to the original question.   And it's fun!  (No commuting!)   :)

 Bill "Ox" Oxley


Unfortunately, we don't get satellite radio yet in Hawaii. For that, I'd fix my car radio so BOTH channels worked. Luckily, there's nowhere to go on a 600 sq mile island that takes time.  At home, I've found that the digital music on the cable system is quite fine. I work in Honolulu radio, and frankly, music without jox and commercials and a mini playlist is wonderful.

Palolo lolo
Denny and Lynda Lou McPhee


SINCE I'VE BEEN  IN THE RADIO GAME SINCE    1940...(TIME OUT FOR  WW2)....I  HAVE BUILT, SERVICED AND MANAGED MANY STATIONS===MANY FORMATS----EVEN  OWNED   SOME STATIONS   FROM ERECTING THE TOWERS TO  HAULING IN 50,000 WATT  FM  XMTRS   WITH ONLY O N E TUBE.    BUT YOUR FEEL FOR  THE   BUSINESS AND YOUR   EVALUATION OF AM FM XM  SIRIUS    POSSIBILITIES   WAS   VERY  THOROUGH   AND VERY MUCHLY  APPRECIATED.,,,,,YOU CAN FEEL PROUD OF THE JOB  YOU ARE DOING. 

LATEST  CADILLAC   WAS  MANUFACTURED  IN  GERMANY,,,,,AND  SURPRISE!!!!  THE  AUDIO SYSTEM  IS    BY   BOSE. 

I CAN HARDLY WAIT   TO  HEAR   ALL THE NEW POSSIBILITIES YOU HAVE DESCRIBED.    

MY TWO SONS----ONE TEACHING COMPUTERS   AND THE ELDER HAS HIS OWN COMMUNICATIONS FIRM  AND I CAN PREDICT RIGHT NOW   THAT  BEFORE LONG    WE'LL  ALL THREE  HAVE THE PROPER EQUIPMENT---THANKS TO YOU.

LARRY---A GREAT ESSAY.

Charles Payne 

BTW-- "FEEDBACK"   "ECHOES OF MY LIFE  IN RADIO"  MOVING  NICELY ON  AMAZON.COM....HAS  BEEN  NECESSARY TO   RE-SUPPLY   NYC  WAREHOUSE....COUPLE OF TIMES.    YOU NEVER KNOW WHY, BUT THEY TELL ME ORDERS  FROM  EUROPE ARE   BEING FILLED ON REGULAR BASIS.    YOU JUST  NEVER KNOW


Satellite radio. The very words bring thoughts of super-high tech sounds filling the airwaves from high above the Earth. The crystal-clear sound blows away anything FM or AM can deliver, and the variety can't be beat. 

I chose to put Sirius into my car, and will soon add a plug-and-play system so I can also enjoy it at home, through my home theater system. Making the decision to go with Sirius was easy; I like the variety of programming, the sound is awesome, and the best part: CLEAR CHANNEL DOESN'T HAVE ITS HANDS IN IT!!!

I'm willing to pay a bit more per month for music channels which are completely devoid of commercials. And as an oldies enthusiast, I find the 50's and 60's channels (Sirius Gold and 60's Vibrations) offer a wider, more varied playlist than do the channels on XM. Stream 4, Movin' Easy, is a good choice for the ride home from work when I can dump all stress in a 20 minute drive. 

This isn't to say XM isn't good, too. They offer up much of the same types of programming as Sirius, but for my money, Sirius is the more serious choice. If it weren't for what happened to radio since deregulation started, there probably would be less of a need for satellite radio. 

Thanks to companies like Clear Channel and Infinity, to name only two, terrestrial radio has become mere, cookie-cutter pap. True, satellite can't provide certain local services such as traffic reports and local weather, but they more than make up for it in other ways. 

I haven't listened to local radio at all since installing Sirius last December. I expect it'll continue that way. 

Jay Rudko 
Pembroke Pines, FL


CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED

Passion and intimacy. Those are the two areas where radio reigns supreme. Or at least did, at one time. Those are the qualities that have enabled radio to survive past challenges. Radio and it's ability to connect with
communities. When you have computers for jocks, no local cultural connections, playlists sent from afar, and no inspiration and originality in programming, just corporate branding and me2-ism...you get sterile,
jockless, passionless jukeboxes. That is not what attracts or inspires people. That isn't even what
entertains them. That is the only thing that allows Satellite radio and what not inroads. I really want to hear what the execs suggest to bring the listeners back. More voicetracking and national contests? 

When I hear Lowry and Mel wax on about "localism", and Mikey Powell talk about gathering a clatch to research such issues, when he ADMITTED he had no idea what the public good meant ... Those people aren't who will save radio.

They have no passion for radio. Only selling. Hell, Mikey ADMITTED the "free market is my religion".

And while radio continues on it's current course, Satellite and others have a chance.

Trey Stone
Great piece.

I feel the impending impact of Internet radio is grossly underestimated. The passion that used to be heard on creative stations and from unique talent is now being farmed on this medium. 

 What Lowry Mays and the boys at Clear Channel fail to comprehend is that the future of radio cannot survive without the younger demos buying in and smaller market farm teams, which allow talent to pay the dues and learn the ropes.

Put another way, where are tomorrow's voice trackers? Until a few years ago, the radio station you listened to was part of your identity. That isn't true today.  More 10-20 year olds are getting their new music fix from alternative forms of media, Internet radio and downloading music.

I don't wish to digress into downloading music as the best thing to happen to the record labels in years.  Those guys are too busy explaining to their bean counters why they've been paying incredible sums of money to get radio airplay, which no longer translate to record sales.

If I really want to know what top 40 songs are true hits, I listen to a amalgamation of European hit radio stations, including Capital Radio in London and Voltage in Paris. For my triple A fix, I have WMVY from Martha's Vineyard and Jimmy Buffett's Radio Margaritaville.

Then you have all of those Internet only stations of every conceivable format springing up. These are love of labor stations and the passion of those individuals is translated into some incredibly programmed Internet
radio stations.

My only complaint, right now, is that I can't listen to these Internet radio stations in my car.yet! That will change. Internet radio is where FM was in the mid 60s and cell phones a decade ago.  Wi Fi, wireless Internet is already becoming commonplace is tech savvy city neighborhoods.  Now, we hear of a new company called Airgo, which is about to release a chip set, which will double Wi-Fi's speed and greatly extending its range.

The moment you are able to receive Internet radio in your car, traditional radio will become obsolete.  That fast. The jury is still out on satellite radio and it's not due to its technology.  It's the programming, production, and presentation.  It still needs work.

John Gorman


Congrats on a wonderful article. It's really well done. BTW, I had no idea we were in similar demographics. I thought you were one of those "young whippersnappers." :-)

E. Alvin Davis
(Editor's note:  "Whataya mean? We BOTH are still young whippersnappers!"  -- Larry Shannon)
Dear Nostradamus,
 
Your predictions,  AM FM XM Sirius 2003, have already been proven accurate given the data you
present.  I often recall those eight tape recorders in the studio at KALL in Salt Lake City back in the
late 1950's.  How we hurried to que up the content between those 2 minute long records of that day.
More than once I wished Fats Domino and others would have added at least another thirty seconds to those
short songs.  Nothing was worst than waking up in a sweat at night after dreaming of being caught short of
time and the record had ended before we were able to ready the commercials, jingles and promo's.
 
We've come along way since then.
 
However, I have reason to believe the programmers of yesteryear had more control over what came out
of those speakers. Like you say, Lawyers are a part of the blame.  Sales should have been included.
I see and hear annoyances every day on radio and TV that demonstrate programmers of today either
are without the knowledge of their predecessors, or no longer willing to stand firm for fear of loosing
a job. 
 
The product people are no longer with muscle and dollars now control programming like never before.
 

Thanks for the Big Picture look at Satellite Radio and putting it into perspective. It reminds me of radio around 1970 when AM still ruled the ratings and FM was just crawling out under the stone where it was a refuge for classical and public programming. My, my how things have changed in 33 years since then.
 
I bought into Satellite heavily in the late nineties, after approaching Mark Cuban, then the broadcast.com big wig, following his keynote address at South By Southwest. I asked him how I could pick up radio programming on the Internet in my car. He told me about the XM/Sirius duopoly. I bought in big, at one point paying more than $50 a share for Sirius (ouch!) back in the bubble. I've continued investing and will still do so  because I believe Satellite is the medium's salvation.
 
Yep, it's still clunky and costs too much. But I've seen the price for equipment decline dramatically, as you pointed out. Someday, I believe the prediction of XM guy who demoed the system for me 2 years ago will come to pass: that equipment will be free, or next to it, and the subscription price will drop, rather than rise.
 
I'm still uncomfortable knowing Clear Channel is a major XM investor, and just as uncomfortable that Lee Abrams is programming--after all, the system he applied to free-form rock radio to make it AOR ultimately killed the format altogether, and ushered in the era of consultants and tight playlists that have made music programming on radio today as dull and unadventurous as it is. I still pine for the days when you'd listen to a jock for the music he or she played as much as their bullshit. Some jocks were actually damn good programmers. I'm hoping that can happen again on Satellite Radio (Abrams, keep those pie charts out of the control room, puh-leeeze). At least I have more options. Despite the fact I already have at least 30 channels at my fingertips on the AM-FM band, the choices I have are stiflingly limited.
 
XM and Sirius at least give me the hope I'll find something I want to listen to on the radio dial.
 
What a great article!  You did a terrific job of telling it like it is.  Having  lived most of my career on the leading edge of technology I have to agree  with every thing you said.  From being "America's FIRST tape jockey"
 to the the now antiquated Satellite Music Network, I have seen a lot of  firsts and you couldn't be more correct about the future.  Again, thanks for a great "think piece"......

 Bob Bruton

Wow!  Whotta thoughtful piece on Satellite Radio. You make some very valid points. I would like to share some of your thoughts at LARadio.com if that is okay by you.
 
You and I are at polar opposites. I did a long editorial a year or 18 months ago citing the enormous mis-steps made by both services. Seeing pianos drop out of the sky in front of a truck driver was hardly a compelling reason to sign up for a service that would take me on one channel from my home in L.A. to New York. The fact that a vast majority of the channels have commercials is a problem. Their marketing challenges they have not solved.
 
Outside of the fidelity that you so rightly note, they have failed to offer that distinctive bit of programming that would get me to subscribe, something I couldn't get anywhere else. Comedy Central struggles with .8 and .9 and when South Park came on, they would jolt to a 5 share and then back to a .8 or a .9.  Look what the Simpson's did for FOX.  I signed up for DirectTV to get the NFL package, but without that incentive, I get pretty much the same fare from my cable service. HBO just played movies until some original programming has made them must-see service. Sopranos and Sex in the City gave us a reason to sign up for the extra service. XM and Sirius has NOT done that.
 
Anyway, you could be right. The movie industry thought laser discs would be the answer. The enormous exploding success of the DVD isn't because it is smaller than the laser, they offered programming you couldn't get any other way. The satellite services have to do the same thing.
 
With all of that said, I would like to reprint a portion of your editorial. You put a lot of work and thought into it and I would love my readers to read it.
LARadio.com

Quite an article Larry!

Dave Tucker

Good essay, Larry. I was an early investor in both Sirius and XM. Your article just adds an AMEN from me. Of course, I hope AM and FM radio will prevail....because, at the moment that's where my mortgage payments  come from.  By the way....please advise me just where those $5 MILLION and $25 MILLION air talents contracts are that you mentioned are. Either I missed the bus or I was on the wrong street corner. 
 

You nailed it.  Couldn't agree more.  One year ago I did not believe it.  I sure do now.  I've invested rather heavily in XM and plan to do the same with Sirius.  My broker thought I was nuts.  Now,  she's investing in XM as well.  It's a no-brainer.  Keep in mind, there are peaks and valleys in any investment. Don't invest more than you can afford to lose. There ain't go guarantees. But I can think of a lot of investments today worse than XM or Sirius.

Jason Walker

Great, great piece.  I was impressed with your enthusiasm about the industry and praise your objectivity since you deal daily with an industry (radio) that isn't fond of satellite radio ... The analysis drips with knowledge.

M.J.T.



Loved your essay on how "terrestrials" are going to soon be obsolete. However, I think the revolution will also be in INTERNET radio, as well as satellite, which is where I'm putting my money.

Laurel Ornish

Since I am not a subscriber to either XM or Sirius, I can't really offer any specific comments about them.  However, I would offer the following...More important (in my opinion) than the specifics of either of the satellite radios services, is your general tone of your essay - "don't sit on you ass and get left behind".  I celebrated my 40th anniversary in broadcasting (mostly radio, some TV) earlier this summer.  I have seen (and in one case worked at) what in earlier times were GREAT radio companies, but they were unable to get out of the "but this is the way we've always done it" mindset.  When times got tough, the thinking was never "What can we do to increase revenue?", but always "How can we cut expenses?".  And I won't even get into consolidation, although I'd like to see an essay from you on THAT sometimes. Is there going to be a place in the Radio Congress for those of us who no longer work at the station level on a day-to-day basis, but in support roles (In my case as a traffic software vendor and admin/ops consultant)? Thanks for the essay.  We can only hope that some decision-makers not stuck in the 1950s or 60s or 70s will read it and at least give your comments the serious reflection they deserve.
 

e-mail YOUR comments to larryshannon@radiodailynews.com 


The original essay is reprinted below ...

* This radio essay contains "links" to other Web sites.  You'll recognize the links by the different color of a word or phrase and by underlined words and phrases.  Just click on the links for additional information and content.

"AM - FM - XM - Sirius 2003"

An essay of opinion by Larry Shannon


"Embrace and learn to use the new "Technologies of the 2000’s" or the new "Technologies of the 2000’s" will chew you up and spit you out in little pieces along the highway to the future."  Larry Shannon – August 2003

In the 1950’s and 60’s in the nighttime, we listened to distant radio stations amidst the crackles, pops and fzzzisttttssss on AM radios.

With the "Technologies of the 2000’s" we listen to radio stations from around the world in clear, digital stereo sound through our computer speakers via the Internet and satellites.

In the 1950’s we could only receive and watch four or five television channels on black and white TV sets.

With the "Technologies of the 2000’s" we can receive and watch up to 500 channels in thousand of colors of the spectrum on digital, high-definition cable systems, via HD.net and satellite TV.

In the early 80’s we paid about $1000 for heavy and bulky VHS videocassette recorders so we could record and watch movies and other programming on television.

In the 90’s, we began paying less than $100 for better quality, lighter-weight VHS recorder-players. With the technology of the 2000’s, we now have DVD recorders and players for less than $100 that allow us to experience video and audio in digital quality on TV and computer screens.

In the 1970’s we installed 8-track player converters in our cars to listen to FM radio, until AM-FM radios became standard equipment in most cars.

With the "Technologies of the 2000’s" we use FM modulators and portable XM and Sirius Satellite receivers to listen to crystal clear, static-free music, news, sports, talk and information beamed down to earth from nearly 25,000 miles away.

Given this track record of technological advances, do you think that time will now stand still and there will be no  further advances in radio programming distribution? Did the quest for the technology to distribute music, news and talk programming suddenly end with the invention of radio transmitter towers? Hardly.

I have a feeling that, in time – and I don’t know how long a time it will be - AM and FM radio receivers, as we know them, will become antiques, and radio-TV towers will become nothing more than junk metal that will be sold by the pound.

These things are inevitable. They will happen.

Are you embracing the new "Technologies of the 2000’s" or are you allowing the new technologies to swallow you up and spit you out? Are you still investing your time, energy and attention in the old technologies of the 60’s?

With the inventions of the transistor and microchip in the 1950’s, a technology boom began and continues. The advances in technology during the past 50 years have been remarkable.  As long as they continue to make faster computers and creative software, the technological progress in radio will continue.

The radio and television industries have certainly taken advantage of the improvements and advances. Look at the size and portability of the TV cameras of today compared to those of the 60’s. Click on any TV and you’ll see reporters broadcasting from the most remote parts of the earth and space thanks to satellite and micro technology.

Voice over talents don't have to book studio time to voice a spot anymore or travel cross-town.  They have their own home-office studios equipped with the latest hardware and editing software.  

The Internet and satellites provide the pipelines through which broadcasters communicate and programming flows in more ways than ever before.  We are no longer landlocked by telephone lines and line-of-site thinking. 

Among the stars are where the new frontiers for communication are now located.  There are no boundaries except the limits of the creative, technological minds of those who will provide us with these micro technological roadways.

I predict that one day both AM and FM land-based stations will begin to "satel-cast" their programming via satellite to their local listeners who will subscribe to a package of local and national radio programming.  

Impossible, you say?  Already DirecTV and the Dish Network are carrying local stations on their satellites to local cities around the country.  Why won't radio take advantage of this stream? All it will take is FCC approval.  You may throw up your hands and say, "It would cost too much!"  Remember those $995 eight and ten feet wide satellite dishes that you needed to watch satellite TV in the 1980's?  The satellite dishes are now less than two feet wide and are selling for about $49.95 -- or they're giving them away if you subscribe to the satellite TV service.  Technology -- and mass distribution -- will bring down the price of AM and FM local satellite delivery sooner than you think.

Without a doubt, the wiser leaders among forward-thinking media organizations that own 12 or 1200 radio stations are already contemplating these satellite distribution possibilities.  Perhaps we could use a few more visionaries and forward-thinking people on the payrolls of these large media organizations and fewer attorneys, MBA's and numbers crunchers.

Last year, in July, Randy Michaels left Clear Channel Radio to take over Clear Channel's New Technologies Division.  Has anyone heard from Randy lately?  Is Clear Channel's New Technologies Division working on satellite delivery of AM and FM programming?

In the 60's and 70's when I would ask our radio station's chief engineer, Darryl Parker, about a problem having to do with compression, signal drift, microphone clarity, etc, he would often reply, "Don't worry, technology will take care of that problem."  His words are as true today as they were 30 and more years ago.  

The demand will be there for quality, static-free content via satellite for AM FM land-based radio stations.  Technology will take care of the details of how to make it work.  

Technology provides solutions to problems and unveils new marvels to us almost everyday.  Just look around you.  Technology is the great monster that has been unleashed, but is a gentle monster that you can tame to serve your needs.

Look at the "International Garage Sales" that ebay's auctions have created.  People who live in the smallest cities of America can now sell goods and services to worldwide customers, thanks to Internet technology.

Those who are still investing in land-based radio stations and AM-FM frequencies are doing so as if those soon-to-be-primitive methods of mass programming distribution will never be replaced. They might do well to wake up and smell the microprocessors!

In the movie, "The Graduate," the character Benjamin, played by Dustin Hoffman, was advised to invest in "plastics." Perhaps the investment advice of this day and age would be to invest in the technologies that build satellites, microchips and microprocessors, and the software companies that provide the brains to run the "Technologies of the 2000’s."

Just as Sam Walton created a better, less expensive and more efficient nationwide distribution network for products through Wal-Mart, so will the "Technologies of the 2000’s" create far more practical, cost-effective and affordable methods of distributing radio and TV programming.  These methods include the Internet, Digital Radio and Satellite technologies.  Already - today, right now - the technology that will replace digital and satellite distribution is being perfected.

About a year and a half ago, I published an essay, "AM-FM-XM" for RadioDailyNews.com. In it, I wrote: "Quit thinking just "local," radio people. The audience thinks "national" and has been thinking "national" ever since cable and satellite TV gave them a larger view of the world and more choices. Local will always be there. But, the audience is fickle. We've become a mobile society and have less allegiance to the cities that we live in.

Most AM’s and FM’s will be around for a long time. But, welcome the new neighbors on the radio block -- XM and Sirius. Recognize them, compete with them. But quit denying their existence. They’re here. Get used to it. Satellite Radio will never replace AM and FM local radio. But, there is an audience for satellite radio. Believe it."

Since that essay was published, XM and Sirius Satellite Radio companies, combined, have signed up at least 1,000,000 subscribers. And more are signing up daily.

What's the reaction of many radio veterans with whom I speak who haven't really taken the time to listen or review the programming on the XM or Sirius Web sites?  Some fear XM and Sirius while others wish both XM and Sirius would go away because they are afraid that it will cut into their already small shares of the local radio audiences.  

Curiously, the strangest reactions I get are those of radio folks who suddenly begin quoting stock shares prices and the quarterly earnings of XM and Sirius as if they had studied it like Biblical scripture.  When I hear those comments, I wonder if it may be that some are trying too hard to come up with excuses not to spend a couple of hundred dollars on an XM or Sirius receiver.  

Automobile manufacturers are now installing XM and Sirius receivers in new cars. It’s not just on the drawing boards or in the planning stages. It is a technology in motion.  XM and Sirius-equipped cars, pickup trucks and SUV’s are rolling off the assembly lines today. New car buyers are asking for them to be installed when they buy cars off the showroom floor.

According to many coast to coast and local truckers who call the Open Road Channel 171 show on XM or Sirius’ Trucking Channel 131, they’re the hottest selling item on the 18-wheel road – as popular as the CB mobile units that were the craze of the 1970’s.

Best Buy, Circuit City, Crutchfield and thousands of Wal-Mart stores from coast to coast are selling XM and Sirius receivers "faster than we can put them up on the shelf," says a local Best Buy salesman whom I interviewed.

Enough has been and will be written about the variety of programming on both XM and Sirius. Those articles are featured regularly in RadioDailyNews.com.  

Personally, I enjoy the news and information channels plus the diversity of the music from the 1940’s through the 90’s, and the combined dozens of country music channels ranging from Rock-a-Billy to Nashville.  Bloomberg Radio channel is a welcome news relief from the shout fests that have lately invaded the Fox News and CNN channels that are also on satellite radio. Sirius features a few more news and talk channels than XM with PRI, NPR, Talk Left and Talk Right.  On XM's "Ask" talk channel, you can hear Michael Reagan, Dr. Dean Edell, Bruce Williams, George Noory and others.  On XM's "Buzz" talk channel, you can listen to Bill Handel, Glenn Beck,  Bill Cunningham, Phil Hendrie, John and Ken and Mike Trivisonno.  Both Sirius and XM offer the ABC Talk Channel, and there's ESPN and NASCAR channels as well as comedy channels and children's channels.  There are live concerts, recorded specials and more to enjoy.

Check out the programming listed on both the Sirius and XM Web sites.  If you thought that satellite radio was just endless streams of music, you'll be pleasantly surprised by the variety and quality of programming. 

Because I listen to XM and Sirius doesn’t mean that I’ve deserted AM and FM local radio. I do, however, enjoy the freedom and variety that satellite radio brings with it. I am not limited to watching the TV to hear the news and financial channels.  All I have to do is to walk out the door and pick up listening where they left off on a XM or Sirius receiver in my car..

Lately, I’ve found myself spending about 75% of my radio listening time tuned in to either my XM or Sirius receiver, though. Once you experience the quality and variety offered, you might find yourself with a similar percentage in your listening habits.  

There is no substitute for AM and FM radio for local weather and traffic information.  However, just as local TV programming is suffering from steadily declining numbers and rising costs, local radio now has to compete not only with nationally syndicated powerhouse stations, but now, satellite radio.

Off all the radio people and non-radio people to whom I have spoken, those who own and subscribe to either XM or Satellite radio have expressed only positive comments about the services.  In fact, most are looking forward to even more channels being added to the current 100 and 101 channel line-up.

Between the two, XM and Sirius, which do I like better?  That would be hard to say.  Both have so many similar techno-features and a variety of programming that it almost makes it impossible to choose between the two.  However, there is enough quality programming on both that I am convinced that I should continue to subscribe to both -- and I will!

There are more than enough channels than you could ever listen to in your car. But, that’s not a problem. Satellite radio is not confined to your car. It is available everywhere that you are.

Sirius has begun selling the portable Kenwood Here2Anywhere™ or the Audiovox S.R.S. Satellite Radio Shuttle™ receivers. Late last year, XM introduced the Delphi SkyFi Receiver and Boombox. Either offers the portability you need to listen to satellite radio in your car, at home or office and, with the battery-powered Boombox, in the outdoors away from electricity.

The "Technologies of the 2000’s" is making the satellite receivers smaller, less expensive and within reach of most consumers. XM will be selling the XM "Roady" by mid-September. For $119.99 you get all you need to listen to XM in your car.

I have both Sirius and XM receivers in my home and car. A friend gifted me with an XM receiver, which I recently installed in the SUV of my 88 year young dad after I purchased a Delphi SkyFi Receiver. I also have the XM Boombox that works with my Delphi SkyFi Receiver. Sirius provided me with a loaner Kenwood Here2Anywhere™ receiver for a review.

As I am writing these words on my computer, I am listening to the "60’s Vibrations" on Sirius Channel 6 via the Internet, through my stereo computer speakers.  It’s a "bonus" at no extra cost for Sirius subscribers. You’re provided with a username and password and can listen to the same music channels that you hear on your Sirius radio receiver through the Internet via your computer’s soundcard -- at no extra cost.

XM has introduced a similar method of listening to satellite radio on computers with their XMPCR unit. It’s $69  and requires a subscription fee of $9.99 if you’re not already a subscriber or just $6.99 with the XM "Family Plan."

Would I ever unsubscribe and go back to listening to only "old fashioned AM-FM radio" again? Never! To paraphrase Charlton Heston, you’d have to pry both my XM and Sirius receivers from my cold dead hands!

At a business dinner few years ago, I remarked to a friend, Bernie Appel, then president of Fort Worth-based Radio Shack, that if it had not been for Radio Shack, I would not be at that dinner speaking with him that night. He was puzzled by what I meant. 

I explained to Bernie how I believed that everything I had done throughout my life was made possible because of the knowledge, skills and experience that I gained through working in radio during my younger years.  I told him how Radio Shack and the products that they sold had played a big part in my radio life.

Growing up as a teenager in the Fort Worth-Dallas area during the mid-60’s, I visited local radio stations with the hope of getting an on-air job. "Practice reading out loud into a tape recorder," was what the PD’s and news directors would advise me.

In those days, even a good budget-priced tape recorder cost at least $100. It was a price that a fifteen year-old kid could hardly afford.

One summer day, I stumbled upon a $15 three-inch brushed aluminum, gray reel-to-reel portable tape recorder in the corner of the bargain bin table at a Dallas Radio Shack store.  I bought it immediately and put it to work for me.

I’d eagerly spend all my spare hours sitting in the family garage, reading stories from the Dallas Times Herald and Dallas Morning News into the tinny-sounding lapel microphone. But, that little tinny-sounding microphone got the job done.

I landed my first radio job at KSKY "660 on the Radio in Dallas" soon afterwards. Had it not been for the advances in transistor technology that helped to create that little $15 three-inch reel-to-reel tape recorder, I never would have been able to afford to buy a tape recorder to improve my enunciation and break into radio.  I might have never enjoyed the wonderful life that began with my young career in broadcasting had I not discovered that little treasure in the bargain bin at Radio Shack.  

I have embraced new technologies ever since that day when I stood in the Radio Shack store and reached into the bargain bin.  For me, it was a moment equal to that moment when King Arthur pulled his mythical sword, Excalibur, from the stone.

All the improvements in technology and the nationwide distribution of electronic products at Radio Shack and other electronic stores continue to make products accessible and prices affordable for every consumer.

When I was 15 years old, I found pure gold in a bargain bin treasure chest when I stumbled across that little $15 three-inch reel-to-reel tape recorder. During the past two years, I discovered two more small treasures that are influencing the future of programming distribution -- my XM and Sirius radios.

From time to time, I learn about "insider specials" for XM and Sirius Satellite radios.  If you'd like to be able to take advantage of these greatly reduced prices so that you can purchase a satellite radio, just send an e-mail to satelliteradio@radiodailynews.com and I'll put you on the list to receive the info.  Your e-mail address will not be passed on to either XM or Sirius.  I'll just provide the information to you via e-mail and you can act on it if you wish.  I will receive no profits, commissions or fees from any of these sales.

AM and FM radio are not going to disappear anytime soon.  So, don't think that I am writing a eulogy for the kilocycle and megacycle.  

However, I believe that we should all look toward and beyond tomorrow and not get too comfortable with what we have today.  Take advantage of your wits, knowledge, skills and expertise, and use them -- and technology -- to become even more successful than you ever thought you'd be.

The right place and the right time intersect from time to time.  Put yourself in the middle of that intersection.  Many of the millionaires and billionaires in broadcasting just happened to be in the right place at the right time.  A lot of them will probably tell you that they're no smarter than you are --- they just took advantage at the right moment and the place.

Don't develop a "herd" mentality.  Be independent in your thinking.  There are no experts.  There are just people who would have you believe that they are experts.  No one has all the answers.  Just because someone signs your paycheck does not mean that he or she has all the answers -- they're just on the signature card of the payroll account.  

Don't think that bosses don't have bosses, too.  We all answer to someone higher up the ladder.

In radio, the real bosses are the listeners who decide whether you and your radio station will succeed or fail.

Listen to the new "Technologies of the 2000’s" through an XM or Sirius satellite radio. You’ll enrich your listening pleasure a hundred times and more.  Satellite radio is not a step-sister or an orphan knocking at the door.  It's a member of the radio family now.  Satellite radio now sits at the table along with the other members of the broadcasting family.

Your AM-FM radio associates and professionals with whom you work and companies that own the stations won’t call you a traitor if you purchase and listen to XM or Sirius radio.  If any of them do, just tell 'em that they’re still living with the technologies of the 60’s.

You’ll not only enrich your listening pleasures 100 times more by getting an XM or Sirius satellite receiver -- you’ll also take steps toward embracing the "Technologies of the 2000’s." 

Lately there has been a lot of finger pointing going on.  It seems like people in radio have formed a circular firing squad and are trying to "point" the fingers of blame at everyone else.  

What's wrong and what's right about radio is nothing new.  I heard the same arguments in the 60's and I'm certain that the 50's, 40's and 30's echoed with the same arguments and people must have said then that "Radio is screwed up."

Some argue that we need deregulation while others defiantly shake their fists in the air and shout "re-regulation!"  I have a feeling that instead of more or less "re" and "de" of regulation, all of us in radio may just need a little more self restraint and discipline, in programming and management, up and down all the ranks, from the officer's clubs to the front lines of the radio battles.

Are mature, responsible adults in charge of programming, managing, promoting, engineering and selling radio?  Some say that there are a lot of immature kids who came in from the playground and took over the teacher's desk who are running the business.

Have the $5 Million and $25 Million air talent contracts scared the programmers and managers?  Who's in charge in radio programming nowadays?  Have talent and programming management become so wrapped up in contractual haggling that the listeners have become the victims? 

Are attorneys running the programming?  Are chief financial officers managing the corporate offices?  Are CEO's, chairmen and COO's spending too much time worrying about stock prices which are tied to their bonuses, and poking their noses into programming territory unnecessarily?

I ask these questions not because I can offer any or all the answers to them.  On the contrary.  It is because I don't think that any of us has the answers to many or all of them that I bring them up.  

If you take the time to look around, you, too, may see a lot of vacuums that have been created by the lack of self discipline and self restraint up and down the hallways of radio -- on the air and off the air.  Who or what will it take to fill those vacuums?

On Monday, August 18, after speaking at the Progress & Freedom Foundation Aspen Summit, FCC Chairman Michael Powell asked the U.S. Congress to draft new media ownership laws.  Then he told reporters, "If we're going to do this, let's pass real laws ... that give the commission more specific guidance about what we want, not just an anti-vote." 

Translation? "If you guys in Congress think you're so smart, YOU do it!  Have at it!  I wash my hands of the whole affair."  Folks, powerful people in Washington never give away power -- they covet and keep it.  If they do give away a part of their power, they are planning to give it all away and they are on their way out the door. 

Yesterday, Marsha MacBride, the chief of staff of the FCC chairman, Michael Powell, resigned "to pursue new opportunities."

Translation?  "I think or know that Michael Powell may be leaving soon, so I am getting out while the getting is good."

Remember this.  When you hear Washington talking, be sure to "Listen to what they don't say, not to what they do say."

When I heard that FCC Chief Michael Powell said, "All I can say is I don't have plans" to leave, that tells me that the key word is "plans."  I sense that an exit strategy is already being "planned." 

However, V-A-C-U-U-M spells problems and opportunities.  It's up to you to take advantage of these opportunities to fix the problems.  And, pardon me, Darryl Parker, technology won't take care of most of these problems.  It'll take the creative minds and strong hearts of a lot of people who want only the best for radio's future to handle these.

Here's something to consider.  If you want to allow the staffs of and the members of Congress to write the rules and regulations that will govern the industry that you work in, live and breathe and depend on for you and your family's livelihood -- and you think they can do it without your input and oversight -- please think again -- then act!  (They mean well, but they need your help and assistance).

Participate and get involved in what ways that you can to make sure you have a voice in the rules and regulations that your elected and appointed representatives will debate, write, rewrite, vote on, pass and sign into law.

Write letters to your elected representatives.  Don't e-mail them.  E-mails get deleted with the click of a computer keyboard.  A letter should get a written answer and you know that it was read by a human staff member.  If you don't get a written response from the elected representative within two weeks, just send a copy of the original letter that you wrote -- and put a cover note on it to let them know that you expect a written response.

Having worked for the Congress for a dozen years, from 1986 until 1998, I can assure you that what you say and what you do, and how you say it and how you do it will make a difference in how the final rules and regulations will be written.

This is a golden opportunity that has been handed to people in the broadcasting industry.  From the earnest efforts and hard work that you put into it, there will be benefits for all -- For the listeners, for people like you who work in all branches of radio and for the advertisers who pay and keep your paychecks coming.

It's up to you.  What are you waiting for?

Comments and feedback about "AM FM XM Sirius 2003? Click here

Larry Shannon               
Publisher
RadioDailyNews.com

--------------

Epilogue

What's next?  The Radio Congress of 2004!

When the Radio Congress convenes next year in a yet-to-be-announced city, radio people from around the country will debate the issues of the broadcasting industry and discuss the "Technologies of the 2000's." Leading technology companies will be invited to join in serious discussions.  We'll have more details as plans are made.  

Visit www.radiocongress.com and sign up to be on the e-mailing list for more information about the Radio Congress.

Related Articles and Links

MICROSOFT is set to launch a new breed of PCs that will turn desktop computers into televisions. Hailed as the next stage in the evolution of the PC, the computers will take data simultaneously from the internet and from satellite and terrestrial TV broadcasts. This will revolutionise the broadcast and internet worlds, forcing a further consolidation of the two media. Microsoft plans to announce a raft of deals it has negotiated with broadcasters and internet content providers within the next month (read)
The New Diamond Age - Armed with inexpensive, mass-produced gems, two startups are launching an assault on the De Beers cartel.
Next up: the computing industry  (read)

Sprint cell phones to offer radio, sports, news recap -  USA TODAY - For an extra $5 a month, certain Sprint cell phone customers will be able to listen to National Public Radio, get recaps of ABC news, soap operas and sitcoms, connect to FoxSports or check the Weather Channel (read)

The FM Pen is not only a fine writing instrument, it's also a superior quality FM radio! This clever ballpoint pen features a built-in digital FM radio. If you want to discreetly listen to music while at school, at work, or in a library, this is perfect. The earphone bud actually attaches to the pen, allowing you to listen to music, while you write (read) XM Satellite Radio
Home

Note ... In the interest of public disclosure, it should be stated that I own one share of XM Satellite stock and one share of Sirius Satellite Radio stock just to keep an eye on them both. I also voice and produce the Overdrive Trucking News programs that run on numerous radio stations around the country and on XM’s Open Road channel. I was not asked or paid to write this essay.